Necessary Always Active
Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
As businesses increasingly adopt multi-cloud and hybrid environments, the need for robust cloud security has never been greater. Comparing modern platforms like Wiz vs Lacework addresses this challenge by offering more than just basic defenses. They provide visibility into risks, context to prioritize the most critical issues, and protection across the entire cloud lifecycle.
The urgency of strong cloud security solutions is reflected in the market’s growth. According to Coherent Market Insights, the global cloud security market is projected to reach USD 46.49 billion by 2025, growing at a 5.9% CAGR. With demand accelerating, the role of leaders like Wiz and Lacework is becoming central to shaping how organizations safeguard their digital future.
As cloud adoption accelerates, organizations increasingly look for platforms like Wiz and Lacework to strengthen security strategies. Both are recognized leaders in cloud security but take distinct approaches, each with strengths, trade-offs, and ideal use cases.
Wiz, founded in 2020 by Assaf Rappaport, Ami Luttwak, Yinon Costica, and Roy Reznik, is a New York–based cloud security company with a mission to simplify how businesses secure the cloud. Built on the founders’ vision of delivering clarity, speed, and scalability, Wiz quickly became one of the fastest-growing players in cloud security, trusted by global enterprises. Its rapid rise is further underscored by Google’s recent announcement to acquire Wiz for $32 billion, a move that highlights the company’s pivotal role in shaping the future of cloud security.
What makes Wiz stand out is its agentless approach, meaning businesses don’t have to install additional software agents on their servers to get security insights. This makes setup faster, simpler, and less resource-heavy.
Wiz delivers advanced risk visualization and vulnerability management, enabling security teams to identify and remediate weaknesses before they can be exploited. Another key feature is its Infrastructure as Code (IaC) scanning, which checks cloud setup files before deployment, catching potential misconfigurations early. Wiz enhances cloud protection through robust container security, ensuring workloads and applications running in containerized environments remain secure.
Founded in 2015 by Sanjay Kalra, Vikram Kapoor, and Mike Speiser, Lacework is a San Jose–based cloud security company focused on delivering data-driven protection for modern enterprises. Its mission is to provide comprehensive visibility across cloud environments, reducing noise and enabling faster threat detection.
Lacework, another leader in cloud security, takes a different but equally powerful approach. Its platform is best known for its Polygraph® behavioral analytics technology, which learns what “normal” looks like in a company’s cloud environment. When something unusual happens, such as an unauthorized login or abnormal data movement, Lacework can quickly flag it.
It also offers runtime protection, which means it monitors applications while they’re running and can respond to threats in real time.
Wiz and Lacework are both positioned as leaders in cloud data security solutions, offering capabilities that go beyond traditional tools. Understanding how their features differ can help businesses decide which solution aligns best with their priorities.
When comparing Wiz vs Lacework, both bring unique strengths to cloud security but take different technical approaches. Understanding these differences helps organizations choose the platform that fits their needs best.
Its unique design allows fast scaling with minimal overhead, and another strength is its risk prioritization engine, which helps reduce alert fatigue. Instead of overwhelming teams with hundreds of alerts, Wiz highlights the most critical risks that need immediate attention.
Wiz also offers an investigation graph, which links cloud events with container or runtime activity. This gives valuable context when investigating incidents, helping teams understand what happened and why it happened.
That said, Wiz still has some gaps, like it lacks robust unified management tools, which larger organizations often rely on for central oversight. In addition, its Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) features, used for protecting sensitive data, are still in the early stages compared to some competitors.
Lacework takes a different path with its signature Polygraph technology. This engine continuously “learns” normal behavior in your cloud environment.
Its focus on continuous analysis makes Lacework especially strong in real-time protection. It flags known threats and adapts to new, emerging risks, which is critical in fast-changing cloud environments.
Another plus is its customizable risk scoring and broad set of integrations, making fitting into existing security workflows easier. Security teams can prioritize alerts based on their business context, rather than using a one-size-fits-all model.
On the downside, Lacework can be more challenging for newcomers, and the learning curve may be steep for teams without prior experience in cloud-native security tools.
While Wiz is praised for its simple deployment and visibility, its pricing reflects that sophistication. For example, Wiz Essential for 100 workloads is priced at US$24,000 per year, while the Advanced plan for the same number of workloads is about US$38,000/year. Additional modules (like for sensors or code security) are extra. This means that while visibility is strong, the total cost rises quickly as organizations need more features and deeper coverage.
Lacework’s pricing also depends heavily on scale and features. Public estimates for small to mid-sized teams start around US$ 23,000-43,000/year, with costs increasing for larger deployments or heavy workloads. Its flexibility lets customers pick what they need, but the unpredictability of adding features or increasing scale can make budgeting harder.
Ideal for organizations needing quick visibility and agentless deployment across cloud environments. Particularly suited for DevOps teams using Infrastructure as Code (IaC) and containerized applications.
Best for enterprises with mature security practices requiring deep behavioral analytics, runtime protection, and strict compliance management.
According to Coherent Market Insights, the industry will reach USD 69.50 billion by 2032. The cloud security market is growing rapidly as businesses increasingly adopt multi-cloud and hybrid environments. Rising threats like misconfigurations, identity breaches, and runtime attacks are driving demand for advanced protection. Platforms that combine automation, real-time insights, and compliance management, such as Wiz and Lacework, are becoming essential for securing modern cloud infrastructures.
The choice between Wiz and Lacework depends on your cloud security maturity and priorities. Wiz suits fast-growing businesses that want quick visibility and low-friction setup, while Lacework is better for enterprises needing deep analytics, runtime protection, and compliance strength. Ultimately, the “best” platform is the one that aligns with your organization’s stage, resources, and security goals.
Sign up to receive our newsletter featuring the latest tech trends, in-depth articles, and exclusive insights. Stay ahead of the curve!